You built an app with Lovable, Replit, Bolt or a developer. CarbonVibe runs the same set of tests on it and tells you, in plain words, what works, what is broken and what to fix first.
Book a fit callThe app is going to hold other people's records: clients, patients, customers, donors, staff. You need to know it is safe before they go in, and you cannot tell by looking.
With Lovable, Replit, Bolt, Base44 or a similar tool. It works when you click through it. You have no way to know what a stranger, or a staff member, could see or delete.
A freelancer or agency delivered it. You cannot judge the work, and the person who built it may not be around to ask. You need an independent read before you rely on it.
Staff use it every day. Nobody has checked who can see what, or what happens when someone leaves. The review runs without reading a single record.
A client, funder, insurer or board member asked how the data is protected. You need an answer in writing that you can stand behind.
A scanner reads settings. This review tests behavior: what each kind of user can actually do, and what breaks when something changes. Thirty-two checks in five groups.
About five pages, written for you. The answer up front: safe to put real data in, not yet, or yes after these fixes. What works. What is broken. What to fix first. Readable in fifteen minutes with no developer in the room.
Every finding with evidence, how to reproduce it, and the exact fix. Written so any developer, or your AI builder, can fix from it. Verified findings and assumptions are kept separate.
The fixes in order. Each one comes as a prompt you can paste into Lovable, Replit or Bolt, with the check that proves it landed. A developer or a partner CarbonVibe recommends can work from the same list. Stopping after the review is a complete outcome.
One hour on a call, walking the report and the decisions it raises. Decisions you make on the call are written back to you the same day.
Twenty minutes. Which tool built the app, who built it, where the data lives, whether real records are in it yet. You leave with a firm price or a clear no.
One page that lists exactly what CarbonVibe will look at, every test account it will create, when they are removed, and when access ends. If real records are already in the app, the review runs in a test organization inside it. No client record is ever opened.
Seven business days. The tests above, run against the live app. Nothing is reported as a finding until it has been verified. Negative results are reported only as far as the test actually ran.
The plain report, the technical supplement and the priced roadmap, then the readout call. Then you decide what, if anything, happens next.
Larger apps are quoted after the fit call, as one firm number. The review stands on its own. You can stop after it and still have everything you paid for.
CarbonVibe is Justin Nevins, Fort Collins, Colorado. Before CarbonVibe he led service delivery at an $8M managed security provider, where the job was proving to clients that controls worked, not promising that they did. CarbonVibe builds on these same AI tools for its own products, so the review knows where they cut corners.
The review is a repeatable set of tests, run the same way every time, with a human verifying every finding before it is reported. Nothing is reported that was not checked against the live app.
You can, and you should. It will find some things. It will also report work it did not do. AI builders have been observed reporting a database change they never ran and naming files they never touched. A checklist tells the builder what to do. It does not tell you whether it was done. This review reads the live app before and after, with test accounts, and only counts what it can see.
No. Most of what the review finds comes from the platform's defaults, not from anyone's mistake. The report separates what the platform did, what the builder did, and what nobody decided yet. It also says what works. Your developer gets the technical supplement and can fix from it. Many do.
No, and no review can. CarbonVibe does not certify compliance with HIPAA, bar rules or any standard. The review tells you, in plain words, what the app does with records, who can see them, and what would happen if an account were deleted or a stranger signed up. Your obligations are yours to weigh. The report gives you the facts to weigh them with.
No. The review works from the app's structure, test accounts and counts. CarbonVibe never opens a client record. If the app already holds real data, the authorization page lists every read and every test in advance, and the review runs in a test organization inside the app.
Good. Keep running it. It catches the obvious settings. Lovable's own documentation says its scans "do not replace a thorough security review." A scan checks settings. This review checks behavior: what a logged-in staff member can actually see and change, and what breaks when someone leaves.
The review is designed so you do not need CarbonVibe for that. Every fix comes as a prompt for your AI builder, with the check that proves it landed, because the builder's own report of what it did is not evidence. Your developer can work from the same list. If you want a referral, CarbonVibe keeps a short list of partners it has checked, and the re-check confirms the fixes landed.
Then the report says so, in writing, and you have it for your board, your funder or your insurer.
That is a common case. The review also covers account ownership: who holds the builder workspace, the code, the domain and the hosting, and how you take them over.
Lovable and apps on Supabase today. Replit, Bolt, Base44, v0 and apps built with Cursor or by a developer are reviewed with the same tests, scoped on the fit call.
Bring the app. You leave with a firm price or a clear no.
Book a fit callNot ready to book? Send a note